Sunday, 19 December 2021
(Originally published at TCW-Defending Freedom on 25th November 2021)
LIKE many people, I went along with the first lockdown. I wasn’t very keen, and I was somewhat critical of it, but I believed the lie that it would be a temporary one-off measure. From the time of the second lockdown, I have been vehemently opposed to the policy. While I have never denied that Covid can be a nasty life-threatening illness for some people, I am critical of the way that governments have manipulated data to exaggerate the extent of the threat.
When Covid 19 vaccines were first rolled out in the UK and around the world in late 2020, we were promised by Western governments and their teams of scientific ‘experts’ who wield enormous, unaccountable power, the media and Big Pharma that the vaccines were a game-changer and that mass vaccination would lead us back to some kind of normality. I was initially very resistant to take the vaccine because it is a new drug with no long-term data regarding side effects and risks. I also have two autoimmune conditions, and while they are easily treated, I am genetically predisposed to a third one that can be quite serious....click here to read on.
Friday, 10 July 2020
I recently watched the baffling and infuriating two-part Channel 4 documentary, ‘The school that tried to end racism’. From the trailer and the fact that it was being aired on Channel 4, I took a wild guess that there would be very little racism that needed eradicating in the school. Sure enough, from the very start C4 excelled in meeting my low expectations.
The show introduced us to a year seven group of multi-ethnic 11-year-olds who mixed freely and stated that they don’t care about ethnicity or skin colour and that they see everyone as equal. Nothing to see here, you might conclude, but as we were about to learn, not caring about skin colour is in itself a form of racism. Clearly, these little bigots were in need of some serious moral instruction to help them overcome the racism they couldn’t see in themselves....click here to read on.
Monday, 25 May 2020
Anyway, here is just a short excerpt from the litany of atrocities that were part of the terrorist campaign that was 'justified' according to Mary Lou McDonald:
-April 1981:The murder of 29 year old mother & census collector Joanne Mathers for the 'crime' of collecting forms.
-November 1974: Birmingham Pub Bombings. 21 dead. 182 injured.
The police and emergency services were greeted with the mutilated corpses and body parts of young pub goers strewn all over the wreckage of the Mulberry Bush and Tavern in the Town.
-June 1996: Murder of Garda Detective Jerry McCabe in attempted IRA robbery of post office van delivering cash in County Limerick.
-March 1972: Abercorn Restaurant bombing. 2 dead. 130 injured.
Bomb explodes on a Saturday afternoon in a packed Belfast restaurant popular with women and children from both communities. Two young Catholic women, Anne Owens 22, and Janet Bereen 21, are killed outright. Of the injured many were severely maimed. Injuries included, limbs blown off in the blast, eyes gouged out from flying glass, facial disfigurements and life long psychological trauma. The IRA initially denied responsibility, but former IRA members have confirmed to journalist Ed Moloney that the IRA carried out the attack as the Abercorn was frequented by off duty soldiers.
-April 1984: Murder of Mary Travers. The Travers family were on their way to church when the IRA ambushed them and attempted to murder their father, Thomas Travers, a Catholic magistrate, who they shot six times in the attack. He survived and in a 1994 letter to the Irish Times had this to say:
"Mary's murder was carried out by a member of an evil and brutal criminal organisation. Some of her killers were members of the murder machine, self-named Provisional IRA. At least one was a member of political Sinn Féin... May I say that on the day my lovely daughter was murdered her killer tried to murder my darling wife also. At that time Mary lay dying on her mum's breast, her gentle heart pouring its pure blood on to a dusty street in Belfast. The murderer's gun, which was pointed at my wife's head, misfired twice. Another gunman shot me six times. As he prepared to fire the first shot I saw the look of hatred on his face, a face I will never forget."
June 1990: Murder of 65 year old retired RUC officer Jim Sefton. IRA place booby trap bomb in the elderly man's car, killing him and critically injuring his wife.
These are just a few snippets of the IRA's terror campaign across these islands. Let's not forget the kangaroo courts and the summary executions of suspected informers, including a child with learning difficulties. Of course, Republicans will continue to try and justify the IRA terror campaign because of high profile atrocities committed by a small number of state forces on incidents like Bloody Sunday. How can Republicans justify responding to the killing of civilians with the killing of significantly far more civilians than rogue elements within state forces were ever involved in? As moderate nationalist politicians pointed out, the IRA assumed this role and authority for themselves in defiance of the majority of people in the nationalist community in Northern Ireland. Irish Republicans are trying to rewrite Northern Ireland's history and paint the IRA and their supporters as a minority facing oppression when the truth is they were one of a number of terrorist organisations oppressing the majority.
If former Prime Minister David Cameron can stand up in the House of Commons and condemn the killings of civilians on Bloody Sunday why can't Mary Lou McDonald now unequivocally condemn IRA terrorism? The British state has held its hands up and admitted there were times its forces acted reprehensibly. It has apologised and admitted wrongdoing. How can Sinn Fein, whose armed wing were responsible for a significantly greater number of civilian deaths than the state, including against nationalists, still claim their campaign was in any way justified? Aside from their murders of civilians, their attacks on the security forces in both jurisdictions of these islands were also reprehensible and devoid of any democratic mandate.
In 2002, the IRA issued an attempt at an apology for the civilian deaths it caused in which they laughably claimed they didn't intend to kill civilians.While some of their members may have not, I'm sure the families of Joanne Mathers, Mary Travers, Brighton, Enniskillen, La Mons et cetera et cetera, might have a very different view on that issue. Meanwhile, they hypocritically campaign for prosecutions of former soldiers for alleged crimes while convicted IRA murderers remain free under the Good Friday Agreement.
Sinn Fein's surge in support in the Republic of Ireland has come largely from younger voters who have no memory or knowledge of the reality of IRA violence. They have been hoodwinked by Sinn Fein's woke virtue signalling and promises of an economic utopia in tiocfaidh ar la la land. Sadly, there are some too, who would have opposed Sinn Fein and the Provisional IRA during the troubles, but in recent years have fallen for Sinn Fein propaganda that they were merely responding to state oppression. If Sinn Fein ever take the reigns of power in the Republic of Ireland they will attempt to rewrite Irish history and give retrospective sanction at state level to a terrorist organisation that murdered 1696 individuals across these islands, almost half of whom were civilians. To say this would be stomach churning to the vast majority of the electorate who rejected Sinn Fein at the recent election is an understatement.
Tuesday, 19 May 2020
After graduating with my master's and a nice chunk of debt, I offered my labour for free, on a part time basis in several sectors, in order to gain valuable experience while also holding down a full time job. However, I discovered that those working for nothing opportunities were highly competitive, and mostly went to people who had the resources or support to do them on a full time basis. Those were the days when I was on the extreme far left politically, and so I blamed capitalism for my situation. Now that my politics have altered considerably, I see that the damage done to my employment prospects was a combination of my own poor decision making, along with the career interests of the mostly left wing academics that taught me, who it suited not to mention the limited opportunities that would come from the degrees they were teaching.
Is it any wonder that a growing number of middle class graduates have become easily deceived by the specious allure of the far left? In order for capitalism to perpetuate itself in a stable manner, it needs to ensure the vast majority of people have acquired a stake in the system. Having large numbers of people leaving university with degrees that don't enhance their employment prospects is detrimental to the needs of the economy and undermines social cohesion. However, the even more disturbing part is that many of these disgruntled graduates and post graduates take no responsibility for their poor educational choices. Instead, they blame the rotten capitalist system for having little demand for the talents of someone who did a research master's on the representation of non-binary identities within the Scottish transgender poetry scene of the late Victorian era. Is it any wonder then, that when Corbyn's grievance driven politics met the frustrated and unfulfilled ambitions and sense of entitlement of many university graduates it was love at first sight?
Ever since I completed university, my lack of an even average salaried job has been the source of much stress and frustration. However, today I take responsibility for my predicament instead of blaming capitalism. While I have been in employment for most of the time, it has largely been in areas not commensurate with my education and not very well paid. Spiraling rents in cities have seen me move numerous times, more often not out of choice. Ironically, one of the most frustrating jobs I've ever done led to a degree of success as a writer. In October of last year, I very reluctantly returned from Britain to Ireland after a spell of temporary agency work had dried up. I was unable to obtain anything more secure despite my efforts, and my hopes of my fiance joining me and setting up a home in Britain came to an abrupt end for the time being. It was a stressful period.
However, since the corona virus lock down my attitude has completely changed. Now, that millions of people are on the dole across these islands I no longer feel like such an under achiever. The week before the lock down, I was offered two not very interesting or well paid jobs. Morrisey knew what he was talking about. I wasn't too enthused by either offer, but I needed an income and I've always had the you just have to get on with things mentality, even if I bitch and moan a bit as I am getting on with things. Technically, some may argue that bitching and moaning nullifies the extent to which you are getting on with things, but let's not get hung up on semantics. Anyway, I was about to start one of the jobs, but due to the lock down the offer was rescinded at the last minute. Instead of dwelling on this setback, I have been taking the advice of some friends on Facebook to focus on what I am grateful for in order to bolster myself psychologically. I had contemplated turning to heroin instead, but I recently re-watched Trainspotting and it put me right off. Taking up being grateful looks like a lot less hassle in the long run and you also get to keep your teeth.
Joking aside, when I see the suffering and loss, both personal and financial, others are experiencing due to Covid-19, I don't have much to complain about. Suddenly, not having a great career that I am worried I may lose or a house whose mortgage I might no longer be able to pay is actually beneficial to my mental well-being. Who would have ever thought that having nothing to show for myself would pay off? Not living up to my full potential is actually a blessing at the moment, or maybe my problem has always been that I have an exaggerated understanding of my own abilities, and it is possible I actually exceeded my potential many years ago. Dear lord, now that's a deflating thought. Wait a minute, I thought this gratitude malarkey was supposed to make me feel better?
Friday, 17 April 2020
While I'm watching more TV than in normal times, I'm aware of the dangers of turning in to a couch potato and so have increased the amount of exercise I'm doing. This week, I've even taken up teaching myself yoga via YouTube. I've been aware for some years that yoga has a lot of physical health benefits. Unfortunately though, it does attract a fair few guru types with a spiritual superiority complex who tend to be on the woke side of the political spectrum. I know this from having had the misfortune to attend a few hot yoga sessions in Brighton about eleven years ago. Hot yoga, for those of you who don't know, is basically yoga with heated air pumped through the room. It has nothing to do with the sexual allure of the instructor, as I found out when I attended my first class hoping to be acquainted with a Christine Hendricks lookalike in leggings, but instead got a sweaty male instructor with a messiah complex in his late thirties. He was insistent that he was a divine being, he emphasised this a lot, and that we could come to know God through yoga, like he claimed he had. For a divine being he was very clammy and lacked humility. He was none too impressed when I told him I would just be happy with the stretching. Anyway, the YouTube tutor is nothing like that, after his short tutorial I just feel very stretched, in a good way, but I am not sure if I am doing it right because I am not feeling smug like some of those people at that hot yoga class.
Apart from the exercise, yoga, reading and binge watching boxsets, there's not much else to do when you aren't allowed to go two kilometres beyond your house. I'm going to have to be imaginative in finding new ways to pass the time. I might ring a family member or a friend and bring up some long since buried grievance and see how well it would go down today. I will keep you all posted.
Thursday, 9 April 2020
However, Icke's charismatic and seemingly deeply held beliefs are only part of his appeal to so many people. This is particularly true with his more recent theories in which he doesn't build on his previous claims that he is the son of God, or that the world's leaders are inter-dimensional shape shifting reptiles. He has probably realised himself that in trying to win over new converts he should probably omit the bits about our lizard over lords until last.
More recently, it is the manner in which Icke weaves many morsels of truth with wild conjecture to arrive at specious conclusions that draws so many otherwise intelligent people to at least give him a hearing. For example, Icke is one of many people, including foreign policy analysts and civil liberty campaigners, who rightly point out that 5G wireless technology can be used by both corporations and states to infringe on personal freedoms by creating a mass surveillance society. This is exactly what is going on in China as we speak. There are also many leading economists, journalists and academics, who as well as Icke, offer legitimate criticisms and raise valid concerns about the long term economic effects of fully locking down society for an extended period of time.
It is by taking these morsels of truth and legitimate criticisms of government policies that Icke gains new converts to his absurd world view. For those of you who fall in to this category, let me put several points to you. Firstly, if the Corona virus was a hoax concocted by a globalist elite, in order for it to be pulled off, it would require large swathes of the medical community from lab assistants, medical researchers, infectious disease specialists, hospital consultants etc. etc to be involved, not too mention a large swathe of other government staff in every country and members of various international bodies. How likely do you think it would be that all of these people who were asked to be complicit in a hoax that covered up the real reasons for purported Corona virus deaths would either agree to it or keep quiet about it? This is so self evident I can't believe I even need to type it out.
Finally, who do you think is more likely to offer credible theories on the origins of the Corona virus? The medical and scientific community, or a man who believes it is a hoax led by inter-dimensional shape shifting lizards, who when in human form comprise the global elite that are determined to usher in a totalitarian global state. If you believe the latter then maybe you've been inhaling too many chemtrails and going heavy on the fluoridated water.